"Clarence Thomas: history of ethical scandals and the Koch corporation - legal problems."

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas attended at least two donor summits of the Koch network and interacted with its billionaire founders, ProPublica reports. This latest revelation is part of a series of scandals involving Thomas, leading to calls for his recusal from cases or removal from office, as well as the introduction of a mandatory code of ethics for the court.

ProPublica reports that Thomas attended at least two donor summits of the Koch network - a right-wing political coalition founded by billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch. He also participated in a dinner with high-profile donors, without disclosing his attendance at the summits or his private flight on a private jet in 2018.

In addition, ProPublica reports that Thomas maintained ties with the Koch brothers by visiting the private estate of Bohemian Grove, where wealthy men gather. The Koch network has brought cases to the Supreme Court, including with the help of staff attorneys representing plaintiffs in upcoming litigation.

ProPublica also reports that during his time on the Supreme Court, Thomas accepted gifts, including at least 38 "resort vacations," 26 private jet flights, VIP passes to sporting events, helicopter rides, stays at private resorts, and a "standing invitation" to a private golf club. These gifts were received from former Berkshire Hathaway CEO David Sokol, the late billionaire Wayne Huizenga, and Apex Oil CEO Paul "Tony" Novelli. None of these gifts were disclosed in Thomas's federal reports.

In addition, ProPublica reports that Thomas's wife, Ginni Thomas, is a supporter of right-wing political activism, which raises ethical questions regarding the intersection of her activities with her husband's work.

Democrats in Congress are calling for an investigation into the relationships between Thomas and his wealthy acquaintances, as well as his failure to disclose these relationships. They are also insisting on the introduction of a mandatory code of ethics for the Supreme Court. However, the chances of such legislation being passed remain low, as Republicans oppose these efforts, viewing them as a partisan attack on conservative judges.

Thomas denies any wrongdoing and claims that he was not required to disclose gifts and trips, as they were provided by his close friends who had no dealings with the Supreme Court. He also states that he is now disclosing such trips due to a change in the rules, although he was not previously obligated to do so. Regarding other reports from ProPublica, Thomas does not comment.