Property Abroad
Blog
Zagreb’s Housing Crunch: Why Rents and Prices Keep Rising — What Buyers Must Know

Zagreb’s Housing Crunch: Why Rents and Prices Keep Rising — What Buyers Must Know

Zagreb’s Housing Crunch: Why Rents and Prices Keep Rising — What Buyers Must Know

Zagreb’s housing squeeze: what’s happening now

Croatia real estate buyers, renters and investors are watching Zagreb closely because the city’s housing metrics have moved into alarm mode. In simple terms: average net salary in Zagreb at the end of 2025 was €1,650, while average rent is €900, and the average price of an apartment is about €2,800 per square metre. Those three numbers explain much of the tension in the market: wages lag, housing costs surge, and affordability collapses for many households.

This article maps the causes, the city’s response, the role of short-term tourist rentals, and what property buyers, investors and expats should consider when making decisions in Zagreb’s real estate market. Our analysis uses official municipal data, the Economic Institute’s housing gap estimate, and the City of Zagreb’s policy statements.

How we got here: supply, demand and investment-driven construction

The rise in Zagreb’s housing costs is not a mystery. Several interacting forces are driving prices higher and supply lower for long-term renters.

  • Demand outstrips supply: The Economic Institute estimates a housing gap of about 38,000 apartments in Zagreb. That is the shortfall needed to rebalance long-term housing demand and supply.
  • Short-term rentals pull stock off the market: The city reports about 2,500 apartments and 3,500 rooms registered for short-term tourist rentals. The ratio between apartments in first and second category rentals is about 1:5, removing many units from the long-term pool.
  • Construction boom, but many units are empty: New residential buildings appear across the city, yet a high number of apartments sit vacant. Different sources estimate between 54,000 and 85,000 empty units out of roughly 350,000 total dwellings, signalling that much of recent construction is speculative investment rather than intended to house residents.

The result is predictable: a smaller long-term rental supply combined with continued tourist demand pushes both rents and sale prices upward. According to the municipal Strategic Information and Research Department, rents and sale prices have risen at more than 10% annually in recent years.

The municipal response: measures Zagreb has taken

Zagreb’s city administration has adopted several concrete measures aimed at stabilising the market and protecting vulnerable residents. Key actions include:

  • Ending the sale of municipal housing and keeping stock in public ownership.
  • Regulating access to municipally owned apartments using income-based criteria, with strong protections for lower-income households.
  • Increasing the tax on short-term rental beds from €40 to €200 per year to discourage tourist conversion of long-term homes.
  • Building new municipal rental developments: a 288-apartment project in Podbrežje, plans for another ~170 apartments, 130 apartments at Klara Nova (via Europan competition), and about 600 apartments in Borovje.

The city says it owns approximately 6,300 apartments, which is roughly 2% of the 360,000 apartments reported in the city (municipal figures use slightly different totals). About 60% of municipal apartments are allocated to socially disadvantaged citizens, with rents for the lowest-income households set at €0.36 per square metre under the new progressive scheme.

These measures are not cosmetic. They reflect a shift in allocation logic: the higher a household’s income, the higher the rent charged for municipal accommodation. The aim is to prioritise limited public housing for those who need it most.

Why short-term rentals matter and what the city can do about them

Short-term tourist rentals reshape urban housing markets by converting long-term homes into income-generating vacation units. Zagreb’s experience follows a pattern familiar across European cities.

What we know about Zagreb’s short-term rental impact:

  • Registered short-stay units: about 2,500 apartments and 3,500 rooms on municipal records.
  • Growth trend: both categories have continued to expand in recent years.
  • The municipality argues that encouraging owners of vacant apartments to list them for long-term rent has helped increase the long-term supply to around 5,000 apartments placed back on the market.

Policy levers available to Zagreb include taxation, registration enforcement, zoning rules and incentives to convert empty apartments into long-term rentals. The city has already used taxation by raising the per-bed charge. That is a blunt but visible tool. It raises costs for hosts and may reduce short stays that generate large occupancy volumes during peak months.

From an investor viewpoint, the tax increase matters because it reduces the net yield of short-term lets relative to long-term leasing. For buyers considering purchasing apartments for rental income, this shift should prompt a re-evaluation of yield assumptions and cashflow stress tests under higher regulatory costs.

The European angle: funding, policy alignment and the Affordable Housing Fund

Zagreb is a signatory to the Mayors for Housing initiative and backed the European Affordable Housing Plan. The city hopes a new EU financing instrument will provide sustained capital to increase affordable housing supply and enable large-scale renovation.

Key EU-related points raised by Zagreb officials:

  • The European plan envisions mobilising up to €300 billion across the EU to boost construction and renovation of social and affordable housing, though the instrument still needs approval and operational detail.
  • Zagreb expects the eventual Affordable Housing Fund to be a multi-year financing tool able to support projects that are otherwise financially unviable at the municipal level.
  • Some EU cohesion instruments have been adjusted so cities can use European Regional Development Fund resources for rental housing, but allocations so far are limited and typically small relative to the scale of Zagreb’s needs.

For investors and developers, EU funding creates opportunities for publicly-backed partnerships and projects with reduced financing risk. For homebuyers and renters, such funds could mean more long-term supply and targeted renovation of ageing stock, easing price pressure over time—if the fund is approved and Croatia channels sufficient national co-financing.

Practical advice for buyers, investors and expats

We translate municipal data into practical steps for people considering property moves or investments in Zagreb.

For buyers and long-term investors:

  • Recalculate yield assumptions: short-term rental returns face higher taxation and regulatory risk. Base models on conservative long-term rental yields and test against rising interest rates and vacancy risk.
  • Location matters: central studio rents range €600–€800, but peripheral family homes differ. Compare capital growth expectations with local rental demand.
  • Check municipal plans: developments in Podbrežje, Borovje and Klara Nova signal municipal supply increases. New supply can weigh on prices in neighbourhoods where large schemes complete.

For renters and expats:

  • Affordability pressure is real: €900 average rent on a €1,650 salary means single-earner households often pay a much larger share of income than the common 30% affordability benchmark.
Buy in Turkey for 135145£
180 715 $
2
1
85
Buy in Turkey for 1690000€
1 954 872 $
6
541
Expect competition for well-priced units.
  • Use formal channels: register leases and check whether a property is licensed for long-term rental. Short-term units converted for longer lets may have different maintenance and legal histories.
  • For buy-to-let investors:

    • Expect policy risk: the city has demonstrated willingness to regulate and tax short-term rentals. Factor in potential further measures such as stricter registration, caps or zoning rules.
    • Consider longer-held assets: policies favour long-term rental stock and social housing initiatives. Partnerships with municipalities or investments in energy-efficient renovations may tap EU funds or incentives.

    Risks and trade-offs: what could go wrong

    Zagreb’s strategy mixes supply-side building, taxation and social allocation. Each approach carries trade-offs.

    • Building new units is expensive and slow. Even with municipal projects underway, the 38,000 apartment gap is not closed by small projects alone.
    • Tax hikes on tourist beds reduce short-term returns but may not flip investor behaviour immediately if tourism yields still exceed long-term rents in peak areas.
    • The high number of vacant apartments suggests a misalignment between what developers build and what local households need. If construction remains investment-driven, affordability will not improve.
    • Reliance on EU instruments is uncertain. The Affordable Housing Fund needs final approval and disbursement mechanisms. Zagreb will remain constrained until funding and national allocation are settled.

    What success would look like and how to measure it

    We need measurable indicators to judge whether Zagreb’s policies are working. Useful metrics include:

    • Annual change in long-term rental stock available to residents.
    • Net reduction in the number of dwellings registered for short-term tourism use.
    • Change in the vacancy rate for completed dwellings.
    • Ratio of average rent to median net salary.
    • Pace and scale of municipal apartment additions to social stock.

    If average rent growth slows to single digits while available long-term units rise meaningfully and vacancy falls, then policies are beginning to change supply-demand dynamics. Until then, affordability pressure will persist.

    My assessment: realistic expectations for buyers and residents

    I think Zagreb’s municipal measures are constructive and targeted toward social equity, but they face structural limits. Taxing short-term rentals and reserving municipal stock for lower-income households are strong short-term protections. Building projects pushed by the city are necessary, but modest in scale against a housing gap of nearly 38,000 units. The presence of tens of thousands of vacant apartments indicates that the problem is as much about what is built and who it targets as about the total number of units.

    For property buyers and investors, that means an environment of transition: higher regulatory scrutiny, potential shifts in yield prospects for tourist lets, and a public sector that is increasingly active in the rental market. For renters and expats, affordability will remain a core challenge until supply aimed at local housing needs increases and wages rise.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: How much does the average person in Zagreb spend on rent versus salary? A: The average net salary was €1,650 at the end of 2025 and average rent is €900, meaning many single-person households spend roughly 55% of net income on rent alone, not counting utilities.

    Q: How many apartments has the city turned into social housing? A: The City of Zagreb owns about 6,300 apartments, and 60% of that stock is assigned to socially disadvantaged residents under the new income-based allocation rules.

    Q: How many properties are registered for short-term tourist rentals? A: There are roughly 2,500 apartments and 3,500 rooms registered for short-term tourist use in Zagreb. The city has increased the tax per bed from €40 to €200 per year to discourage conversions.

    Q: Will EU funds solve the problem? A: EU instruments could help, but approval and allocation take time. Zagreb supports the proposed Affordable Housing Fund and hopes it will provide long-term capital. Meanwhile, current cohesion funds are limited for large-scale urban affordable housing projects.

    Final practical takeaway: with average rent at €900 and average net salary €1,650, affordability is strained and will likely remain so until a sustained increase in long-term rental supply or significant wage growth narrows the gap.

    We will find property for you

    • 🔸 Reliable new buildings and ready-made apartments
    • 🔸 Without commissions and intermediaries
    • 🔸 Online display and remote transaction

    Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!

    I agree to the processing of personal data and confidentiality rules of Hatamatata

    Popular Offers

    Buy in Turkey for 1690000€
    1 954 872 $
    6
    541
    4
    4
    240
    4
    4
    260

    Need advice on your situation?

    Get a  free  consultation on purchasing real estate overseas. We’ll discuss your goals, suggest the best strategies and countries, and explain how to complete the purchase step by step. You’ll get clear answers to all your questions about buying, investing, and relocating abroad.

    Vector Bg
    Irina

    Irina Nikolaeva

    Sales Director, HataMatata