Real estate agencies in the U.S. are facing a class action lawsuit from home sellers over commission fees


Men work at the construction site of a luxury apartment complex in downtown Los Angeles, California, March 17, 2015. REUTERS / Lucy Nicholson
The acquisition of the license
March 29 (Reuters) - A federal judge in Chicago ruled on Wednesday that home sellers accusing the National Association of Realtors and a group of real estate agencies of colluding to inflate commission rates can move forward as a class action lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Andrea Wood's ruling grants class action status to past home sellers seeking more than $13 billion in compensation and creates a separate class of current and future sellers who want an injunction against future violations of U.S. antitrust laws.
The plaintiffs are seven home sellers. The judge's ruling states that membership in each class "can be expected to be in the hundreds, minimum." The classification means that plaintiffs can bring broad claims against the National Association of Realtors, RE / MAX LLC (RMAX.N), Long & Foster Inc, and other corporate defendants instead of filing separate claims for substantive relief.
In a statement, the National Association of Realtors said it was "disappointed" with the decision and defended the industry's listing practices. The lawsuit challenges the requirement that sellers make "single unilateral fee offers" to buyers' brokers when a home is listed for sale through a multiple listing service. Sellers say such a system puts pressure on sellers to offer high commissions to attract buyer brokers.
Mantill Williams of the National Association of Realtors said the practice "saves time and money for sellers by having so many buyer brokers participating in the local market, thereby creating more buyers for sellers." A spokesperson for RE/MAX said the company does not comment on pending litigation. Long & F
The class seeking monetary compensation
The class seeking monetary compensation includes certain home sellers who paid a commission between March 2015 and December 2020 in states such as Texas, Florida, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina and Colorado, court documents show.
The case of Moehrl et al v. National Association of Realtors et al, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, No. 1:19-cv-01610.
Tags
We will find property in USA for you
- 🔸 Reliable new buildings and ready-made apartments
- 🔸 Without commissions and intermediaries
- 🔸 Online display and remote transaction
Our managers will help you choose a property
Liliya
International Real Estate Consultant
Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!
Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!
Popular Posts
We will find property in USA for you
- 🔸 Reliable new buildings and ready-made apartments
- 🔸 Without commissions and intermediaries
- 🔸 Online display and remote transaction
Our managers will help you choose a property
Liliya
International Real Estate Consultant
Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!
Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!
I agree to the processing of personal data and confidentiality rules of Hatamatata
Popular Offers
Need advice on your situation?
Get a free consultation on purchasing real estate overseas. We’ll discuss your goals, suggest the best strategies and countries, and explain how to complete the purchase step by step. You’ll get clear answers to all your questions about buying, investing, and relocating abroad.
Irina Nikolaeva
Sales Director, HataMatata