Property Abroad
Blog
French Realtors Push for U.S.-Style MLS — Can SNPI Change the Market by 2028?

French Realtors Push for U.S.-Style MLS — Can SNPI Change the Market by 2028?

French Realtors Push for U.S.-Style MLS — Can SNPI Change the Market by 2028?

Why France is Looking to the U.S. for its next real estate tool

France’s property market is about to be tested by an idea imported from the United States: a multiple listing service. This conversation matters for anyone watching real estate France because it could change how listings move, who controls market data and how transparent transactions are. SNPI, one of the country’s three main real estate associations with about 15,000 members, is leading the charge.

I find the proposal intriguing and risky at once. An MLS could improve cooperation among agents and reduce duplication of effort, yet building a workable system runs up against entrenched technology, local customs and cost structures.

What is an MLS and why agents in France care

An MLS is a shared database of property listings that licensed brokers supply and use to find buyers and co-operate on commissions. In the U.S., the MLS is core infrastructure: brokers own the data and feed consumer portals. That model is credited with supporting competition, pricing transparency and faster transactions.

By contrast, in France the dominant model is portal-first: commercial websites host listings and control the data. That has shaped agent behaviour and economics for two decades. For context:

  • In the U.S. model, brokers own listing data and grant access to portals.
  • In France, portals own the data and agents pay to post listings.

SNPI President Alain Duffoux argues that a broker-driven MLS would make cooperation simpler for SNPI members, since they are a single professional association. He wants to increase listing transparency and reduce fragmentation in the market.

SNPI’s progress, the RESO experiment and the 2025 setback

The SNPI effort is not theoretical. The association sought certification from the Real Estate Standards Organization (RESO), the U.S. nonprofit that sets data standards for MLSs. That step shows technical seriousness: RESO certification means the system can speak the same data language as many U.S. platforms.

Key milestones and facts from SNPI’s attempt:

  • SNPI is RESO-certified for its MLS-in-progress (certification occurred last year).
  • The association tried to build a national system but hit major obstacles and paused after a false start in 2025.
  • One practical constraint is cost: building a portal-grade system is expensive; Duffoux has cited a nine-figure euro price tag for a portal-scale platform.

Going through RESO taught SNPI a lesson flagged by U.S. experts: don’t build the consumer portal first. In markets that start with portals, changing data ownership and incentives is hard.

Cultural and structural hurdles that matter to buyers and investors

Technical standards are one issue. The other is culture. France’s real estate ecosystem differs from the U.S. in ways that shape incentives and outcomes for buyers and investors.

Major factors to consider:

  • High share of For Sale By Owner: about 40% of properties are listed without agents, which reduces the pool of listings that an MLS could centralise.
  • Buyer representation is uncommon: buyer brokerage is not routine in France, making co-operation on compensation less established.
  • Agent earnings are lower than in the U.S., which reduces willingness to pay for new services or to change business models.
  • Notaires play a bigger transactional role: notaires draft preliminary contracts and coordinate closings; any broader data or process changes will touch their workflows.

These factors mean an MLS that simply copies the U.S. technical architecture will likely fail unless it also solves incentives for agents, sellers and portals.

SNPI’s strategic alternatives: EU-level MLS or a national build

After the 2025 setback, Duffoux shifted tactics. He now works at two levels:

  • He is exploring an MLS at the EU level through CEPI, the European association that covers 26 countries. An EU or cross-border MLS could benefit from scale and shared governance.
  • As a contingency, SNPI plans to relaunch a national system with a target to go live in 2028 if the EU route fails.

There are advantages and liabilities to both paths.

1
1
46
2
1
48
Buy in France for 176200€
200 762 $
2
1
61
Buy in France for 520000€
592 488 $
2
71
Buy in France for 395000€
450 063 $
2
1
64
A CEPI-level MLS could avoid duplicating platform costs and offer harmonised data rules across borders. But cross-border projects bring regulatory complexity, divergent national property laws and varying market practices.

A national SNPI MLS is simpler in governance but still must address competition from entrenched portals and the cost barrier for an effective consumer-facing system.

Global outreach and partnerships: SNPI opens a Lisbon office

SNPI is not retreating from international engagement. The association opened an SNPI Global office in Lisbon on June 24, and has adopted the National Association of REALTORS® system of global ambassadors. SNPI has also signed agreements with organisations such as the Miami Association of REALTORS®.

These moves are not symbolic. They are practical in three ways:

  • They give SNPI technical and governance examples to emulate.
  • They create channels for training agents in co-operation and buyer-broker practices.
  • They establish diplomatic relationships that can help if a CEPI-level MLS is pursued.

Gregg Kantak, the NAR global ambassador involved with France, advised audiences not to build a portal before solving the data and incentive problems. That is a blunt operational point: get the data ownership, compensation rules and agent buy-in first.

What the MLS debate means for buyers, investors and expats

We must be precise about the practical implications. An effective MLS would change market dynamics but not overnight.

Potential benefits if SNPI or CEPI succeed:

  • Greater transparency in listings and history, making comparative valuation easier.
  • Faster matching of buyers and sellers through wider agent cooperation.
  • Reduced duplicate marketing costs and fewer blind listings across multiple portals.

Risks and complications to watch:

  • Agents may charge different fee structures to recoup portal losses, raising transaction costs for sellers.
  • Data privacy rules in the EU could constrain what is shared and how consumer-facing search is managed.
  • Portal operators may respond by erecting paywalls or restricting feeds, fragmenting audiences.

For investors and buyers what matters is timing and selective advantage. Right now, offshore buyers and expats still rely on portals and local agencies. An MLS could lower search friction later, but the transition could create short-term disruption.

Tactical steps for investors and buyers in 2026–2028

If you are active in the French property market, here is what I recommend based on SNPI’s plan and market realities:

  • Keep using the major portals for sourcing listings, but verify ownership and seller history with the listing agent or notaire.
  • Work with a local agent experienced in co-operation across multiple firms; those agents will be better positioned if an MLS arrives.
  • Factor in transaction timings driven by the notaire system; an MLS will not change the legal closing process.
  • Track SNPI and CEPI announcements; 2028 is the working launch target for an SNPI national MLS if EU efforts fail.
  • Budget for data inconsistency risks if you rely on feeds from portals or aggregators.

These are practical, immediate steps. We must not assume transparency arrives automatically; it will need governance, technology and new incentives.

Data standards, governance and regulatory questions

Technical standardisation is a prerequisite for interoperability. That is why SNPI sought RESO certification. RESO provides schema and APIs that make it easier to move listings between systems without loss of fidelity.

Governance questions that will shape any MLS outcome:

  • Who owns the data—brokers, portals or the MLS entity?
  • How are listing fees and commission sharing enforced?
  • How will GDPR and other EU privacy rules affect data sharing?
  • Who enforces data quality and dispute resolution among members?

My view is blunt: technology without governance will not change business incentives. SNPI’s move to explore CEPI is sensible because it offers a forum for resolving cross-border policy questions, but negotiating 26 national approaches will be slow.

What could derail the project

There are realistic failure modes that every investor should watch for:

  • Lack of agent buy-in: if agents see a net loss of income or control they will withhold listings.
  • Entrenched portals reacting defensively by tightening access or subsidising exclusive offers.
  • Cost overruns: a portal-grade system that reaches consumers requires heavy investment; Duffoux cited a nine-figure euro expense.
  • Regulatory pushback related to competition law or data privacy.

If these risks materialise, the likely result is a fragmented set of interoperable micro-MLSs rather than a single national platform.

Our assessment: realistic hope, non-trivial roadblocks

I respect SNPI’s ambition and their adoption of standards work. The association demonstrates technical awareness and global networking. But I am skeptical of a smooth transition. The core issue is incentive alignment. You cannot make agents hand over proprietary data unless they see a clear financial benefit.

Practical takeaway: for the next two to three years buyers and investors should assume the portal-led status quo persists. Monitor SNPI and CEPI updates and be ready to change search and sourcing strategies if an MLS rollout begins. The association’s target to deliver a national system by 2028 is the single most concrete timeline to watch.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is SNPI and how large is it?

SNPI is one of France’s three national real estate associations, with about 15,000 members. It represents independent agents and aims to improve professional standards and cooperation.

Why did SNPI seek RESO certification?

RESO certification aligns data formats and APIs with international standards used by many MLS systems. SNPI pursued certification to ensure technical interoperability and to learn from the U.S. model.

What are the main obstacles to creating an MLS in France?

The main obstacles are:

  • Cultural reluctance to share listings among agents, with around 40% of sales happening For Sale By Owner;
  • The dominance of portals that own listing data;
  • The high cost of building a large consumer-facing platform;
  • Differences in transaction practice, such as the role of notaires.

If SNPI’s MLS launches, when will it happen?

SNPI has a contingency plan to launch a national MLS by 2028 if an EU-level MLS via CEPI cannot be established.

We will find property in France for you

  • 🔸 Reliable new buildings and ready-made apartments
  • 🔸 Without commissions and intermediaries
  • 🔸 Online display and remote transaction

Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!

I agree to the processing of personal data and confidentiality rules of Hatamatata

Popular Offers

3
3
156
3
1
73
2
1
48

Need advice on your situation?

Get a  free  consultation on purchasing real estate overseas. We’ll discuss your goals, suggest the best strategies and countries, and explain how to complete the purchase step by step. You’ll get clear answers to all your questions about buying, investing, and relocating abroad.

Vector Bg
Irina
Irina Nikolaeva

Sales Director, HataMatata