Property Abroad
Blog
Indiana Tops Realtor.com’s State Report Card — Why the Midwest Beats the Coast on Housing

Indiana Tops Realtor.com’s State Report Card — Why the Midwest Beats the Coast on Housing

Indiana Tops Realtor.com’s State Report Card — Why the Midwest Beats the Coast on Housing

Why this realtor ranking matters to buyers, investors and movers

The real estate USA market is messy, but Realtor.com’s latest state-by-state report card gives a clear signal: affordability and homebuilding are clustered in the Midwest and the South, while the coasts and New England face the tightest conditions. That split matters for anyone buying a house, investing in rental property, or planning a relocation—because where homes are being built affects prices for years.

Realtor.com graded all 50 states plus Washington, D.C., with letters from A to F, using a combination of housing affordability and the pace of new-home construction. Joel Berner, senior economist at Realtor.com, put it bluntly: "Without new homes being built, affordability will suffer under constrained home supply." We agree—supply is the basic arithmetic behind housing prices, and this report highlights which states are adding supply and which are not.

In this analysis we unpack the methodology, run through the winners and laggards, explain what the rankings mean for different types of buyers and investors, and list the policy and market risks that could change the picture in the next few years.

How Realtor.com graded states (and what it does and doesn’t tell you)

Realtor.com combined measures of affordability with measures of new-home construction to assign letter grades. Affordability in the report uses median listing prices and median household incomes for each state. Homebuilding is measured by recent construction activity and starts—data the portal incorporates to assess whether supply is expanding fast enough to meet demand.

Important limits to keep in mind:

  • The grades are high-level snapshots; they do not replace local market due diligence. City and neighborhood dynamics can contradict state-level trends.
  • Realtor.com reports median listing price and median household income for each state; these two figures drive affordability comparisons, but they do not capture wealth concentration or distributional effects within states.
  • Homebuilding metrics show direction, not precise future production. A state with modest current building can still accelerate construction quickly with policy shifts.

Our analysis uses the state's listed medians and grades to point investors toward practical next steps, not to assert absolute forecasts.

The winners: why the Midwest and South keep scoring well

The top-performing states are dominated by the Midwest and the South. Those regions share three practical advantages: cheaper land, fewer regulatory constraints on development, and household incomes that are competitive relative to local house prices. That mix is attractive to buyers and investors looking for value.

Key takeaways from the top 10 list:

  • Indiana is No. 1, with a grade of A, a median listing price of $346,000, and a median household income of $77,000. The state’s affordability is driven by income-to-price ratios, though Realtor.com notes Indiana’s new-home construction is "unremarkable," hinting at possible future supply pressure.
  • Texas earned an A with a median listing price of $300,000 and a median household income of $61,000; its large population (31,709,821) means more housing demand, but also more new construction in many metro areas.
  • Other top-ranked states include Iowa (A, $486,000 median listing, $88,000 median income), South Carolina (A, $379,000, $77,000), North Carolina (B+, $299,000, $65,000), and Nebraska (B+, $346,000, $77,000).

Full top 10 recap (grade, median listing price, median household income):

  • 1. Indiana — A — $346,000 — $77,000
  • 2. Iowa — A — $486,000 — $88,000
  • 3. South Carolina — A — $379,000 — $77,000
  • 4. Texas — A — $300,000 — $61,000
  • 5. North Carolina — B+ — $299,000 — $65,000
  • 6. Nebraska — B+ — $346,000 — $77,000
  • 7. Delaware — B — $486,000 — $88,000
  • 8. South Dakota — B — $379,000 — $77,000
  • 9. Arkansas — B — $300,000 — $61,000
  • 10. Oklahoma — B — $299,000 — $65,000

What this means for buyers and investors

  • For homebuyers: These states offer more purchasing power for a given income. A first-time buyer or someone trading down can expect lower monthly mortgage payments relative to income in many of the top-ranked states.
  • For investors: Lower acquisition prices and steady construction in some metros can produce attractive yields, but investors should test local rental demand and job growth indicators—state-level affordability is not a substitute for neighborhood-level fundamentals.

The laggards: why the West and New England are struggling

The bottom of the ranking is heavily Western and New England states. Realtor.com assigned grades of C to F to these areas. The reasons are familiar: high housing prices, strong demand, and slow growth in new supply caused by zoning constraints, permitting delays, and strict building codes.

Notable on the bottom 10 list:

  • New York ranks worst with an F, a median listing price of $668,173, and a median household income of $82,657. The state’s population of 19,867,248 underlines the scale of demand facing constrained supply.
  • Massachusetts (F, $763,660 median listing price, $98,170 median income) and Hawaii (F, $767,360, $94,556) are also in the bottom tier, where median prices have climbed far faster than incomes.
  • California received an F, with a median listing price of $742,305 and median household income of $95,065—high prices combined with restrictive regulation slow new construction.

Full bottom 10 recap (grade, median listing price, median household income):

  • 50.
Buy in USA for 299000$
299 000 $
4
1
107
Buy in USA for 220000$
220 000 $
2
2
133
Buy in USA for 625000$
625 000 $
1
1
78
1
1
63
Buy in USA for 550000$
550 000 $
4
3
258
4
4
303
New York — F — $668,173 — $82,657
  • 49. Massachusetts — F — $763,660 — $98,170
  • 48. Rhode Island — F — $563,235 — $85,698
  • 47. Hawaii — F — $767,360 — $94,556
  • 46. California — F — $742,305 — $95,065
  • 45. Connecticut — F — $518,892 — $95,392
  • 44. Oregon — D- — $564,005 — $80,356
  • 43. Montana — D — $628,387 — $72,066
  • 42. New Jersey — D — $556,344 — $99,357
  • 41. New Hampshire — D+ — $586,123 — $96,809
  • Why construction slows in these states

    • Local zoning that favors single-family lots reduces density and raises per-unit land costs.
    • Lengthy permitting processes increase build times and soft costs for developers.
    • Environmental and building-code constraints can increase construction costs, particularly in coastal or mountainous regions.

    These are policy choices with real market effects: jurisdictions with strict rules are effectively limiting future housing supply, which keeps prices high.

    How to use this report when deciding where to buy or invest

    We focus on practical next steps rather than clickbait takeaways. Here are targeted strategies depending on your goal.

    If you are a homebuyer looking for affordability:

    • Look for states and metro areas where median listing price is under $400,000 and median household income is above $60,000—that mix produces stronger income-to-price ratios.
    • Consider whether your job or remote work options are stable enough to move farther from high-cost coastal metros; relocation often yields immediate buying power.

    If you are a buy-to-rent investor:

    • Favor markets with steady job growth, population growth, and enough new construction to prevent overheating but not so much that rents fall abruptly.
    • Check local permitting trends and multifamily pipeline data; a state may be building single-family homes while limiting apartment construction—impacting rental inventory.

    If you are a developer or institutional investor:

    • Focus on jurisdictions where policy reforms are on the table—places easing zoning or streamlining approvals can give first-mover advantages.
    • Factor in construction wages and material costs: even in affordable states, supply constraints like labor shortages can compress margins.

    Policy and market risks that could change the rankings

    The report is a snapshot, not a prophecy. Several dynamic forces can shift who is affordable and who is not:

    • Zoning reform: states or major cities that loosen density rules can accelerate supply and improve affordability over a multi-year horizon.
    • Interest-rate changes: higher borrowing costs reduce buyer capacity and can lower demand, but they also reduce profitability for speculative new construction.
    • Migration patterns: if population flows change due to jobs, climate events, or tax policy, demand for housing in certain states could rise or fall rapidly.

    Weigh these risks when using the Realtor.com grades to make decisions; what looks like a safe investment today can change if supply or demand shifts.

    Regional snapshots: what to watch on the ground

    A few short, actionable notes for specific regions.

    Midwest and South (current strengths)

    • These regions combine lower land costs and simpler permitting in many counties. Expect continued interest from households seeking affordability and from investors chasing yield.
    • Watch metro-specific job numbers. Not all cities in these states perform the same—some have stronger tech or manufacturing clusters that matter for rents and resale.

    West and New England (structural headwinds)

    • High prices plus strict regulatory regimes keep supply tight. That supports price stability for existing homeowners but raises entry barriers for buyers.
    • In some coastal metros, climate-related costs and insurance availability are emerging as additional constraints on both buying and building.

    Sunbelt boom and local caveats

    • States like Texas and North Carolina show both strong population inflows and new construction—yet growth carries municipal challenges like infrastructure strain and school capacity limits that can affect desirability.

    Practical checklist before you buy or invest

    Run this checklist to translate the report’s state-level data into action:

    • Confirm local median listing price and compare with your target mortgage payment.
    • Check local building permit trends and multifamily pipeline to estimate future supply.
    • Review employment growth, major employers, and migration stats for the metro you’re considering.
    • For investors, model rent growth assuming 2–5 years of continued construction in the area; stress-test for slower or faster growth.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: What is the main reason the Midwest and South score better on Realtor.com’s report card? A: The principal drivers are lower median listing prices relative to median household incomes, cheaper land, and in many localities, easier permitting and zoning that allow more new-home construction.

    Q: Does a top grade mean a market will always outperform for investment returns? A: No. A high grade signals better current affordability and often more supply growth, which can mean steadier long-term returns but not necessarily higher short-term price appreciation. Investors should combine grade data with job-market and neighborhood-level analysis.

    Q: Are the worst-ranked states bad for all buyers? A: Not always. High-ranked states are generally better for affordability, but the bottom-ranked states can still offer strong investment opportunities in select neighborhoods, high-rent districts, or for buyers seeking stability rather than rapid price growth.

    Q: How should policymakers use this report? A: The report highlights where supply constraints are worsening affordability. Policymakers can prioritize zoning reform, faster permitting, and targeted incentives for new housing to improve long-term affordability.

    Bottom line and what you can act on now

    Realtor.com’s report card shows that affordability and new home construction are concentrated in the Midwest and South, while the West and New England face the tightest conditions due to zoning and permitting hurdles. For buyers and investors, the practical approach is to combine these state-level signals with local job growth, permitting trends, and neighborhood fundamentals. A concrete takeaway: Indiana’s top ranking pairs a median listing price of $346,000 with a median household income of $77,000, which is a clear, testable data point for anyone comparing markets and planning a move or investment.

    We will find property in USA for you

    • 🔸 Reliable new buildings and ready-made apartments
    • 🔸 Without commissions and intermediaries
    • 🔸 Online display and remote transaction

    Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!

    I agree to the processing of personal data and confidentiality rules of Hatamatata

    Popular Offers

    3
    120
    5
    143
    2
    165

    Need advice on your situation?

    Get a  free  consultation on purchasing real estate overseas. We’ll discuss your goals, suggest the best strategies and countries, and explain how to complete the purchase step by step. You’ll get clear answers to all your questions about buying, investing, and relocating abroad.

    Vector Bg
    Irina
    Irina Nikolaeva

    Sales Director, HataMatata