Property Abroad
Blog
$418M Realtor agreement for affordable homeownership

$418M Realtor agreement for affordable homeownership

$418M Realtor agreement for affordable homeownership

When my husband and I sold our NYC condo last year, all the brokers we interviewed refused to represent it for less than 5% or 6% commission. Each of them said that a lower amount would mean that other agents would refuse to show the listing to their clients, or discourage their clients who stumble across it on an online listing service from viewing it themselves. This way of working may soon become a thing of the past. This invisible way of working may soon become a thing of the past.

The National Association of Realtors

I approved a deal on Friday that, according to the federal judge's approval, will put an end to the long-standing policy that prevents registered real estate agents from posting sales listings in the widely used Multiple Listing Services database unless they disclose the amount of the buyer's agent commission. Listing agents will effectively be prohibited from including this number in the listing. The policy changes, which will take effect in July, are part of a $418 million settlement in several ongoing class-action lawsuits in which the National Association of Realtors (NAR) was accused of using its monopoly position in the market for American real estate sellers. NAR denied any wrongdoing in a statement on Friday. "NAR has worked for many years to resolve this dispute in a way that benefits our members and American consumers," said Nakia Wright, acting head of NAR. "It has always been our goal to preserve consumer choice and protect our members to the fullest extent. This agreement achieves both of those goals."

Despite record-high housing prices, American homebuyers may finally be getting some financial relief. It is widely known that changes, if approved by a federal court, will not only significantly reduce the commissions earned by realtors but also lower the costs of buying and selling real estate. At best for buyers, this could lead to a decrease in housing prices. Here in the United States, a 5-6% commission paid by the seller is considered standard, a norm we rarely question. But we should be asking questions. There are only a few countries where this level is so high.

Recommended real estate
Buy in Spain for 259000€

Sale townhouse in Madeira 274 696,00 $

202 м²

Buy in Spain for 495000€

Sale house in Campello 525 000,00 $

4 Bedrooms

3 Bathrooms

228 м²

Buy in Spain for 4495000€

Sale house in Marbella 4 767 424,00 $

4 Bedrooms

4 Bathrooms

489 м²

Buy in Spain for 144000€

Sale other properties in Castellon 152 727,00 $

2 Bedrooms

1 Bathroom

61 м²

Buy in UAE for 47652500$

Sale flat in Dubai 47 652 500,00 $

6 Bedrooms

2 Bathrooms

1095 м²

Buy in UAE for 757038$

Sale flat in Dubai 757 038,00 $

4 Bedrooms

1 Bathroom

189 м²

In the UK, Netherlands, and Singapore, it is around 2%. In Spain, Germany, and the UAE, it is 3%. When online listing services became popular, there were widespread predictions that listings viewable directly by homebuyers would lead to a decrease in real estate prices in the U.S. But nothing of the sort happened. A possible explanation? The buyer's agent's commission structure at the outset discourages them from showing homes that offer them less money. Last year's studies analyzing Redfin data confirmed that what we were told last year is a reality: homes with lower commissions for the buyer's agent not only sold for longer periods but were also less likely to sell at all. Additionally, there is another issue. The current system incentivizes not only the seller's agent but also the buyer's agent to achieve the highest price for the property. In other words, they earn more if they push their clients to overpay for a home. This also drives them to close deals regardless of whether they are beneficial for the buyer. However, simply raising the price does not mean an increase in dollar commissions. The problem is that in the case of a failed sale, the agent representing the buyer receives no compensation. This is not just a misguided incentive; it is a huge conflict of interest that is virtually unknown in real estate.

Make me an answer in this format: '{text}'

Comment