The day the PP lost possession of Spain - Diario16plus

In the PP, since the days of the Popular Party Alliances, they believed they were the guardians of Spain's immortal essences. They thought that Spain belonged to them alone. Anyone who wanted to talk about Spain, about the future of Spain, about the meaning of Spain, about Spain itself, had to pass under a fusillade on Henova Street as a mechanism to recognize their ownership.

This happened with the Ciudadanos, the first to try to challenge Spain. Felipe Gonzalez never needed to because he explained Spain better than they did. José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero didn't (and doesn't) understand Spain and is too focused on identity because of a misunderstanding of the Frankfurt School.

This happened with Vox, the second to challenge Spain. The difference between Ciudadanos and Vox is that they at least tried to explain what Spain means to them. Whether the PP, Ciudadanos and Vox like it or not, they have a clear idea of Spain.

The Peperos have been the owners of Spain with exclusivity since the days of Jose Maria Aznar and don't have to explain what Spain is and what they want for Spain. This is mine and I leave it at that, flying the flags of Spain in all the cities we rule (maybe somehow we should have researched all those flags and which company sells them). Spain meant flying flags. It meant wearing a flag on your wrist. It meant listening to this musician or that musician (as if art could have a nationality). Meant doing what whoever was in power did as they saw fit. But not with Mariano Rajoy in particular, because no one knew which way he was going.

Basically, for PP Spain means saying you are very, very Spanish, even though their actions may be harmful to Spain. Yesterday they called a rally against amnesty and in defense of their? Spain. Tens of thousands of people gathered in Madrid to protest a likely decision in favor of Spanish separatists fugitives from Spanish justice by acting President Pedro Sanchez. Alberto Núñez Fehu, with his usual speech problems; Aznar, Rajoy and Isabel Díaz Ayuso, who it is not known whether he was there because of the former's shortcomings or to cut his grass at ankle level (How quickly his adherents declared that he clearly supported his supreme leader!) were there. Either way, there were PP members there at a PP event that they are trying to sell as an act of patriots of all kinds. This is being tried to sell by the media, which is funded by blue autonomy funds, it should be noted.

On October 8, there will be a similar rally in Barcelona, organized by the Catalan Civil Society. The social organization, which can be called whatever you want because freedom of speech still exists, is not affiliated with any political party. Perhaps there will be fewer participants, perhaps many more. But it will certainly be a rally of Spaniards, not just a part of Spaniards. Perhaps representatives of Vox, Ciudadanos, PP, PSOE (recall that polls show that almost 50% of Socialist voters do not want amnesty), PSUS, no party and all parties will be there to defend the impossibility of amnesty for coup d'état and abusers of public funds.

The PP called a party event (hundreds of buses to fill Felipe II) because they still believe Spain belongs to them alone. But it is because of this event that they lost their ownership of the country they claim to love so much. They are defeated by haste. Aznar has always been a cowering dilettante on the table.

If the PSOE intended (especially if teaming up with Sumar and other parties) to hold an act in favor of consent in Spain (a euphemism for amnesty), it would probably gather as many people as the PP. It's not a question of quantity, as the party amanuenses like it, but of quality. When ethical, historical and social considerations are involved, not just political ones, attendance always goes up unless someone is trying to capitalize on it. How many Vox voters didn't show up because of party affiliation? How many PSOE voters (recall that polls show that almost 50% of Socialist voters don't want amnesty)? How many Spaniards, in general, didn't show up because they don't want to mix justice with private interest?

They turned to the Spanish again, believing that the only way to see Spain was their way (which, by the way, is not very clear). And thus it became clear that she was not their property. Despite all the bracelets, flags and Spanish hype, Spain is not theirs, and they conceded because of their slowness. Aznar was always an obdurate idiot with his feet on the table. They didn't want to share the country with the rest of us. And as a result, millions of people who could have shared what was defended at the rally did not show up. A social appeal organized by a political party ends up alienating those who don't see themselves in that party. This has always happened with communist parties that spoke for the entire proletariat, but they were not elected. Now it is happening with the PP. Believing they are the holders of Spain or the only accredited converts (with their ISO and all), they end up making sure no one follows them. If the PSOE intended (especially if teaming up with Sumar and other parties) to hold an act in favor of consent in Spain (a euphemism for amnesty), they would probably gather as many people as the PP. It's not a question of quantity, as the party amanuenses like it, but of quality. When ethical, historical and social considerations are involved, not just political ones, attendance always goes up unless someone is trying to capitalize on it. How many Vox voters didn't show up because of party affiliation? How many voters