Cassation Court Case Could Reopen Citizenship Route That Drives Interest in Italy Property
A high-stakes court fight with direct consequences for real estate Italy buyers
If you are watching the real estate Italy market because citizenship or residency would affect your purchase plans, this legal fight matters. Two US families asked Italy’s highest criminal court, the Cassation Court, to limit how far back a 2025 citizenship law can reach — and the outcome will shape the options available to tens of thousands of property buyers, investors and expats with Italian roots.
The central question is straightforward: should a law passed in March 2025 that tightened rules for citizenship by descent apply to people born before it took effect? The case was heard by an expanded panel of the Cassation Court on a Tuesday session reported by the Associated Press, and a binding decision is expected in the coming weeks. For people pursuing homes, second residences or rental investments in Italy, the ruling will affect whether a pending citizenship claim can be revived or remains blocked.
What the March 2025 law changed and why it matters for buyers
The government led by Giorgia Meloni approved a decree in March 2025 that limited access to Italian citizenship by descent (jure sanguinis) for descendants removed by more than two generations. Previously, claimants could seek citizenship if they established an unbroken chain to an Italian ancestor born after Italy’s unification in 1861.
- Who enacted the change: Giorgia Meloni’s government.
- When it was enacted: March 2025.
- Immediate legal status: Italy’s Constitutional Court ruled the new law valid last month, but the Cassation Court can clarify how it applies in time — that clarification is what the two families are pursuing.
Why does this matter for the property market? For many buyers from the Italian diaspora, citizenship makes relocation simpler, eases long-term residency, and removes visa restrictions that influence financing options, tax residence choices and eligibility for certain local services. Citizenship can reduce friction when applying for long-term financing from Italian banks and can simplify bureaucratic processes related to buying and owning property in Italy.
The legal argument and the stakes: who stands to gain or lose
The plaintiffs, represented by lawyer Marco Mellone, told the Cassation Court that the restrictive law should apply only to persons born after it took effect. If the court accepts that interpretation, people born before the law’s enactment could still pursue claims based on ancestors who left Italy in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Key facts from the case:
- Two US families brought the suit to the Cassation Court.
- The argument is that the law should not retroactively bar claims from people born before the law took effect.
- The expanded panel’s ruling will be binding on lower courts and will clarify how the law must be applied nationwide.
The plaintiffs say the law, as currently applied, has frozen hundreds of claims. Among the people photographed outside the courthouse were at least a dozen individuals whose applications are on hold. They included Karen Bonadio, who brought family photos and birth certificates showing her great-grandparents emigrated from Basilicata to upstate New York, and Jennifer Daly, a retired history professor whose grandfather emigrated in 1912 from the province of Trento.
One complexity in previous lower-court rejections has been the rule that naturalization of an emigrant before the birth of children may break the transmission of citizenship. At least one of Mellone’s clients faced rejection before the new law because of that principle; Mellone’s plea now focuses on whether the new law can reset expectations for descendants already pursuing claims.
Scale of the impact: the numbers behind the argument
The lawyers and claimants point to a broad pool of potential applicants. According to Foreign Ministry statistics cited in the court filings, about 14 million Italians emigrated between 1877 and 1914. If the Cassation panel rules that people born before March 2025 can pursue claims under the older rules, millions of descendants in the United States and parts of Latin America could regain a route to citizenship.
That figure matters for the property market for two reasons:
- Diaspora demand has historically influenced sales in regions with strong emigration ties.
- Gaining citizenship removes legal barriers to long-term stays, and it can change the practical calculus for buying rather than renting.
What this could mean for property buyers, investors and expats
From my reporting and conversations with lawyers and buyers involved in jure sanguinis processes, the Cassation decision will have immediate and practical consequences for three groups of people active in the Italian property market.
- Buyers who already have pending citizenship applications
- If the court rules that the law applies only to births after March 2025, many frozen applications could be reactivated. That would let applicants claim citizenship and then take steps toward EU residency and the legal rights that come with a passport.
- For many, having citizenship simplifies mortgage eligibility with Italian banks, removes visa renewal concerns and can change tax residency intentions.
- Prospective buyers weighing whether to purchase now or wait
- Some people buy property as a residence with short-term visas in place, planning to apply for citizenship later. A restrictive ruling would raise the cost and risk of that strategy because visa regimes are more limiting.
- Conversely, a favorable ruling would encourage diaspora buyers to move faster on bargains in regions popular with returnees.
- Investors and second-home buyers without Italian ancestry
- Indirect effects matter. If a large wave of newly eligible citizens were to reclaim nationality, they might increase demand for small town homes and renovation projects, pushing prices in bargain areas upward.
Practical consequences to consider:
- Citizenship status affects access to EU mobility and family reunification rules, which matter for relocating dependents.
- Mortgage conditions differ for non-EU and EU citizens; banks consider residency and nationality when underwriting foreign buyers.
- Long-term tax residence can be influenced by time spent in Italy and by whether one holds Italian citizenship; buyers should consult tax advisors before relocating.
Region-specific demand and where buyers with citizenship tend to look
While I avoid broad claims about prices, there are observable patterns in buyer behavior that are relevant:
- Many descendants returning to Italy aim for Tuscany and Florence if they value cultural life; this is illustrated by case stories such as Alexis Traino, who lives mainly in Florence and had documents pending when the law passed.
- Southern regions like Basilicata, Puglia and Calabria draw buyers interested in reconnecting with place of origin and often seeking affordable renovation opportunities.
- Smaller towns with historically high emigration rates can see spikes in interest from returning diaspora when the administrative path to citizenship is open.
For buyers, these patterns translate into different risk-return profiles. Urban cores with strong job markets offer rental liquidity and higher prices; villages can offer lower entry prices but require renovation, local bureaucracy and a clear plan for utilities and connectivity.
How to act now: practical steps for claimants and property seekers
Based on experience advising readers and interviewing lawyers who work on jure sanguinis cases, here are concrete steps you should take if you have Italian ancestry and interest in buying property.
- Gather documentary evidence now. That typically includes certified birth, marriage and death certificates, naturalization records (or proof of non-naturalization) for the ancestor, apostilles and official translations into Italian.
- Keep applications on file and track deadlines. If your claim was frozen by the March 2025 decree, ask your lawyer about re-filing or about administrative remedies pending the Cassation panel’s ruling.
- Consult an immigration lawyer experienced in Italian citizenship law before committing to property purchases intended to serve as a base for a citizenship claim, especially if your timeline depends on a favorable ruling.
- If you need to relocate before a citizenship decision, explore residency visas and permits that fit your situation: work permits, student visas, elective residency, and family reunification where applicable. Each has different implications for property ownership and mortgage access.
- Speak with lenders early. Italian bank requirements vary for non-EU buyers; gather pre-approval letters and documentation so you can move quickly when a suitable property appears.
- Factor transfer taxes, notary fees and local property taxes into your purchase budget; citizenship will not change the headline purchase tax but it can affect long-term tax residency choices.
I have seen cases where documents from small-town civil registries in Italy can take months to process; start the chain now if you have any intention of claiming citizenship.
Risks and legal uncertainties buyers should weigh
This is not a simple binary outcome. Even if the Cassation Court rules in favor of the claimants, there are other legal obstacles that might continue to block some applications. Historic naturalizations, incomplete civil records, and interpretation disputes over whether an ancestor’s naturalization broke the transmission chain remain practical barriers.
- Expect delays: paperwork from local municipalities can be slow and unpredictable.
- Legal interpretations vary: different court decisions have applied jure sanguinis rules in ways that can be favorable or unfavorable to applicants.
- Market timing risk: waiting for a court decision can mean losing a property to another buyer; buying early without citizenship entails visa and financing constraints.
For investors without Italian ancestry, the ruling is less directly material but should inform expectations about diaspora demand for certain types of property.
Scenario analysis: market implications under two likely outcomes
I will keep this concise and practical.
Scenario A — Cassation rules the law applies only to people born after the decree:
- Many pending claims could be reactivated, reopening a route to citizenship for people born before the law took effect.
- Short term: administrative backlog as offices process revived claims; mid term: modest uptick in diaspora property interest, especially in regions with historical emigration.
Scenario B — Cassation rules the law applies immediately to all claimants regardless of birth date:
- Pending claims stay blocked; diaspora-driven demand may soften.
- Buyers who relied on an expected passport to facilitate relocation will need to pursue alternate visas or delay purchases.
Both outcomes create opportunities for professionals: lawyers, translators, notaries and local agents will be busy either processing renewed claims or advising buyers on alternatives.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can bring a jure sanguinis claim under the old rules?
Under the previous interpretation, anyone who could document an unbroken chain of Italian citizenship from an ancestor born after 1861 could claim citizenship. The March 2025 decree narrowed that route for descendants removed by more than two generations.
How many people could be affected by the Cassation decision?
Court filings and Foreign Ministry statistics cite 14 million Italians who emigrated between 1877 and 1914. The Cassation ruling will determine how many descendants among their heirs can maintain or revive claims already pending.
If I buy property without citizenship, can I still live in Italy?
Yes, but your residency depends on the visa or permit you hold. Non-EU buyers commonly use work visas, study visas, elective residency or family-based permits. Each route has different rules and implications for banking and taxes; seek legal and tax advice before finalizing a purchase.
What immediate steps should I take if I have a frozen claim?
Assemble certified records, contact an Italian immigration lawyer, and monitor the Cassation Court’s decision. If you plan to buy property while your claim is frozen, secure lender pre-approval and consider short-term visas that allow you to be present in Italy.
Final assessment and practical takeaway
This is a legal fight with concrete consequences for people who plan to buy property in Italy because of ancestral ties. The Cassation Court’s expanded panel will issue a binding ruling in the coming weeks that will determine whether the March 2025 law can be applied retroactively to people born before it took effect. If you have a pending jure sanguinis claim, gather certified civil records now and consult an Italian immigration lawyer immediately; the court’s decision will directly affect your residency options and could change how you finance, register and live in a property in Italy.
Tags
We will find property in Italy for you
- 🔸 Reliable new buildings and ready-made apartments
- 🔸 Without commissions and intermediaries
- 🔸 Online display and remote transaction
International Real Estate Consultant
Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!
Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!
Popular Posts
We will find property in Italy for you
- 🔸 Reliable new buildings and ready-made apartments
- 🔸 Without commissions and intermediaries
- 🔸 Online display and remote transaction
International Real Estate Consultant
Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!
Subscribe to the newsletter from Hatamatata.com!
I agree to the processing of personal data and confidentiality rules of Hatamatata
Need advice on your situation?
Get a free consultation on purchasing real estate overseas. We’ll discuss your goals, suggest the best strategies and countries, and explain how to complete the purchase step by step. You’ll get clear answers to all your questions about buying, investing, and relocating abroad.
Irina Nikolaeva
Sales Director, HataMatata